5 Common Mistakes That Are Killing Your Annual Reviews (And How to Fix Them)
Avoid these pitfalls that turn performance reviews into dreaded obligations instead of growth opportunities.
Marcus Johnson
Chief People Officer
The Problem with Annual Reviews
Let's be honest: most employees dread annual reviews. Managers procrastinate writing them. HR struggles to get everyone to complete them on time.
But it doesn't have to be this way.
After analyzing thousands of review cycles, we've identified the five most common mistakes that turn what should be growth conversations into anxiety-inducing checkboxes.
Mistake #1: The "Surprise" Review
The problem: Employees hear critical feedback for the first time during their annual review.
Why it happens: Managers avoid difficult conversations, saving everything for the "official" review.
- The fix:
- Implement continuous feedback throughout the year
- Use the annual review to summarize themes, not introduce new information
- Train managers on giving real-time feedback
Mistake #2: Recency Bias
The problem: Reviews focus heavily on the last 2-3 months, ignoring the rest of the year.
Why it happens: Our brains naturally remember recent events more vividly than distant ones.
- The fix:
- Keep a running document of accomplishments and feedback
- Use quarterly check-ins to capture notes throughout the year
- Ask employees to submit self-reviews covering the full period
Mistake #3: One-Size-Fits-All Questions
The problem: Using identical generic questions for every role—from engineering to sales to design.
- The fix:
- Create role-specific competencies
- Allow customization while maintaining core company values
- Let teams add questions relevant to their function
Mistake #4: Focusing Only on Weaknesses
The problem: Reviews become a list of things to improve, ignoring what's working well.
- The fix:
- Use a balanced framework (e.g., 3 strengths, 1 development area)
- Start with wins before discussing growth opportunities
- Help employees leverage strengths, not just fix weaknesses
Mistake #5: No Follow-Through
The problem: Reviews happen, goals are set, then everyone moves on until next year.
- The fix:
- Schedule quarterly progress check-ins
- Make development goals part of regular 1:1s
- Create accountability partners
The Bottom Line
Annual reviews don't have to suck. The companies getting reviews right see higher engagement scores, better retention, and stronger performance.
The secret? Treat reviews as ongoing conversations, not annual events.
Marcus Johnson
Chief People Officer
Marcus has built high-performing teams at startups and enterprises alike.
Ready to transform your reviews?
See how Perfo Review makes 360° feedback simple. Start free—no credit card required.
Related Articles
The Complete Guide to 360° Feedback: Everything You Need to Know in 2025
Learn how to implement effective 360° feedback that actually improves performance and builds trust across your organization.
50 Performance Review Questions That Actually Get Useful Answers
Stop asking generic questions. Here's a curated list of questions that spark meaningful conversations.
Get more insights
Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly tips on performance management and team building.